  
        
        One Hand
        Clapping: 
        The Taoe of Music
        WholeArts and
        The Psychic Internet is proud to present the
        "Preface" and "Part One" of this
        remarkable book by Daniel d'Quincy. "One Hand
        Clapping: The Tao of Music," originally published by
        WholeArts in 1991, is a book-length essay on the
        performance of music from the perspective of Eastern
        philosophy and religion. Mr. d'Quincy is a noted
        composer, musician, author, inventor, educator, speaker,
        and photographer. Please visit his unique music sites at WholeArts: syNThony, and the WholeArts Online Music Conservatory. 
        Page 30
        Chapter Five 
        What is a thing?  
        This is a
        question to exercise your mind at length. You will come
        up with many ideas and descriptions. An object that
        occupies space/time, for example. But, will you forgot
        that a thing is also a noun? Do
        you suppose it is possible that it may be only a
        noun? Do things have reality only as grammatical
        constructions? When you say, It is raining,
        you dont attach any actual reality to the word
        it, do you? But you may be doing just exactly
        that in a more generalized way in the great majority of
        other cases that are basically equivalent even though in
        them you do not use the abstract pronoun it
         and you may be doing this without even noticing. 
        Are we hypnotized
        and tricked by language itself, the instrument of
        thought, into seeing the world within the parameters of
        purely verbal constraints? Since language is not the only
        instrument of thought, can this help to explain how we
        can see life differently through the lens of art and
        music? These are questions that may lead to a revolution
        in your patterns of thinking and feeling. 
        Grammar, per se,
        has already come up in this inquiry with respect to
        subjects and objects (the case of I
        am
). We may note now that nouns can be both
        subjects and objects. We think of things as subjects and
        objects because things seem to be discreet and distinct
        in some respect. This is why we are called to name them
        individually. The act of naming is the active side of
        consciousness, and, of course, we do it by way of making
        sense of things, so that each finds its
        place. 
        Obviously, this
        is not only a western preoccupation. In every phase of
        life, mature people of every culture are called upon to
        make very clear distinctions between things. We quite
        rightly make distinctions between the hours of the day,
        and the weeks of the year. Some of us, anyway, know very
        well the difference between being penny wise and pound
        foolish. In order for things to be understood, they have
        to be analyzed in terms of their differentiated parts. We
        do have to cut up the chicken in order to eat it. And,
        our information comes to us today in the form of little
        bytes. 
        But, from the
        point of view a baby, from your point of view before you
        knew your name  in other words, from the point of
        view of the void - all these things do not appear to be
        discreet and distinct. It is surely a very interesting
        fact, therefore, that leading spiritual traditions from
        East to West pay honor to the undiscriminating innocence
        of the child. Be as children, says Jesus  or like
        babies, says Lao Tzu. The baby is supple and flexible,
        instinctively right in action, unconditional in love, and
        inherently lovable. It is always wise to carry one of
        your own baby pictures with you at all times. When people
        get mad at you, hold it up and say, See.
        Thats me! Its a way of saying that you
        can easily be wrong and innocent at the same time. It is
        a way of blurring the distinctions. (Next Page) 
         |